APOLLO RESULTS

 


Home
Partners
WP1
WP2
WP3
WP4
WP5
WP6
Contact Information
APOLLO RESULTS

Injuries constitute one of the most significant and costly public health problems in the European Union (EU) Region. Every year, more than 235 000 EU citizens die as a result of an intentional or an unintentional injury; this is the equivalent of more than 600 fatalities per day. Despite downward trends noted in many EU countries, injury still ranks first in years of potential life lost and fourth among all causes of death. Nevertheless, unlike researchers involved in the combat against chronic diseases, researchers and practitioners in injury prevention and safety promotion face the challenge of dealing with a highly predictable and preventable cause of human death. The wide variation of injury mortality rates across different regions of the world, or even different states within the same region, implies that there is high potential for prevention. Indeed, in the industrialized EU Region, where annual unintentional average mortality rates range from 17/100 000 in countries such as the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, to 100/100 000 in Latvia and Estonia, it has been estimated that up to 50% of fatalities could have been avoided were all EU member states to adopt existing effective injury prevention practices and policies.

EC and WHO policy initiatives (Council Recom­mendation and WHO Resolution) have rightfully emphasized injuries as a public health priority; the respective initiatives, abide not legally binding, provide a policy framework for a more systematic and coordinated approach in injury prevention both at national and European levels. Apart from health care delivery once the injury occurs, the health sector plays an important facilitating role in injury prevention, along with different policy sectors, which are also involved in delivering primary and mostly passive prevention, such as the transport sector for road traffic injury, the justice sector for the prevention of violence and bodies responsible of building standards and manufacturers for domestic injuries.

 This Final Technical Implementation report presents the achievements of the APOLLO project (Grant agreement: 2004119), which include two milestone deliverables:

  *The EU Hospital Discharge Data (HDD) Web-Query System on injuries, providing the European citizens, policy makers and experts with a user-friendly application of severe injury, based on patient-level data from 18 EU countries. The system relies on routinely collected data and therefore, necessitated a minimum start off budget for the development of the infrastructure and population with data across the member states, as contrasted to other EU efforts relying on costly systems of new data collection and more ambitious targets. It uses computerized algorithms to accommodate for ICD-9-CM or ICD-10 coding and can be run with minimal maintenance costs.

      The Web-query can be freely assessed at: https://www.unav.es/preventiva/apollo/asistente/index.php.

  *The European Code Against Injuries (ECAI), a simple and comprehensive guide addressed to the European citizen and summarizing the most effective available practices in reducing the major types of unintentional injuries. The ECAI represents the first systematic effort to produce a tool through a consensus-building process aiming to raise public awareness on injury prevention and safety promotion. Following the successful example of the “European Code Against Cancer”, developed in the context of a previous EU-funded project, it was made possible to develop and evaluate the ECAI through a systematic process aiming to incorporate common elements of available injury prevention practices most likely to be adopted across the multi-cultural EU milieu. The methodology is now in place and update can be done at minimum cost, as new injury related risks emerge. Practically, injury prevention practitioners and Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs) are now equipped with an electronic version of the ECAI, currently available in 15 languages, spoken by ~90% of the European citizens. All translated versions of the ECAI are available at: www.euroipn.org/apollo/WP3_ECAI.htm.

Two main injury prevention issues have also been addressed, given the considerable lack of knowledge regarding: (1) barriers to uptake on a personal level or apply on a community level existing evidence-based good injury prevention practices and efficient policies, and (2) specific indicators to follow up the progress of injury prevention and safety promotion efforts on community, national and EU level. In response, 4 reports were produced during the lifespan of the project summarizing barriers and facilitating factors for the implementation of injury prevention programs targeting different age groups and recommendations on how to overcome barriers in injury prevention, along with customization tips derived from already successfully implemented prevention initiatives. More than 250 indicators aiming to assess exposure to injury risks, as well as the burden and the economic consequences of injuries were also developed. Most importantly, apart from the theoretical framework, actual figures for the vast majority of these indicators across 18 EU countries are currently available through the Web-Query system. 

The implementation component of the project focused on two major and costly injury fields, namely, how to address prevention of falls among older people and injuries among vulnerable road users. EU-wide applicable prevention computer based models, which can be accustomed in individual member states, were also developed targeting the prevention of injuries among pedestrian school age children and adolescent two-wheel motorized vehicle users.  

Dissemination activities were undertaken by both individual work package leaders and in collaboration with the dissemination package of the project. The former comprised mainly preparation of over 20 scientific articles publishable in peer-reviewed journals and acknowledging the contribution of the EC, out of which 15 have already been published or accepted for publication upon completion of the project. Numerous opportunities for presenting the results in scientific events, including conferences, meetings and seminars, targeting both injury prevention experts and policy makers, were used, while an effort is being made by the two APOLLO partners who sit on the Executive Board of the International Society for Violence and Injury Prevention (ISVIP) to disseminate the products to its world-wide membership. Practitioners and individuals at risk were also reached through various channels and platforms in order to ensure the broadest possible support for change. A platform of EU NGOs was built aiming to endorse the EU-Recommendation on the Prevention of Injury and the Promotion of Safety adopted by the EU-Council and the European Parliament (May 2007), express NGOs’ commitment to align their actions in promoting health and safety in Member States and at European level and undertake dissemination of the APOLLO products as the first indication for testing their commitment.

Short descriptions of the series of tools developed in the course of the project are listed below in the interest of the reader:

*ATLAS Report: It measures the burden of injuries in terms of hospitalization episodes in eighteen countries of the EU. In order to better approximate discharge events with incidence, a number of indicators related to urgent hospital admissions due to injuries are presented. The report shows what types of injuries derive from these data and shows the variability between countries. The described data derived from the web-query system for Hospital discharge data  

 

 

*Efficient strategies to reduce the burden of Injuries in Europe and specific suggestions of policy measures to increase return on the investments. The report aims to support EU countries in calculating the economic consequences of injury for purposes of priority setting in prevention.

 

 

*An analysis on the best strategies to measure the severity of injuries. The report seeks to review state of the art in injury severity assessment methods and contribute to the improvement of the ICD9-AIS automatic conversion method (toward AIS/ISS based severity scores) consisting in an extension of its applicability towards important body parts not yet fully considered in existing methods.  

 

 

*Tools, including software for computing direct costs of injuries. The web tools are SPSS scripts/syntaxes and have been developed to analyze, harmonize, aggregate and merge hospital-based data for the calculation of direct medical costs. A manual with guidelines is available explaining the methods for data analysis of hospital-based surveillance data, while giving a description of the collection, harmonization and analysis of data on injury incidence and related healthcare consumption and costs. Available at: http://www.eurosafe.eu.com/csi/eurosafe2006.nsf/wwwVwContent/l2apollo.htm

 

*Questionnaire to collect data for a new indicator on exposure. The report seeks to communicate information to all parties interested in collecting information on exposure indicators, using the case of Road Traffic Injuries and provides recommendations to assist decision-making. Concurrently, it aims to explore whether in place systems can be used to assess future trends in injury mortality and morbidity on the basis of existing exposure indicators.  

 

*Success Factors and Barriers to Implementation of Prevention Interventions. The report aims to serve as a useful guide for those injury prevention experts and safety practitioners who wish to implement effective interventions for the prevention of: road traffic injuries, alcohol-related injuries, drowning and occupational injuries.

 

 

*How to overcome the barriers to implement recommendations for youth (<24 years) injury prevention. The report seeks to demonstrate perceived barriers on the part of young people to the adopt safety measures and provide the conceptual framework for guiding multidisciplinary campaigns targeting adolescents and young adults.

 

 

*Strategy and policy recommendations including feasibility for implementation of effective policies and customization of good practices in various settings. The report aims to provide meaningful messages regarding ways to improve implementability of effective policies and to customize successful practices in injury prevention in diverse EU settings. Countries with relatively small sized population, along with new and non-EU Member States received high total feasibility scores even though in practice they may face more difficulties in implementing effective policies.  

 

*Feasibility of large-scale interventions for preventing falls among older people in the European Union - A technical report on the methods and results of the studies conducted by Work package 4 of the Apollo project. This study aims to fill gaps in knowledge on specific aspects that hinder the possibility of evaluating the feasibility of large-scale interventions for the prevention of falls in older people.  

 

 

*Recommendations for promoting the prevention of falls in community dwelling older people. These recommendations targeted EC and National/ local governments, policy makers and all parties involved in initiating and developing action plans for the prevention of falls in older people.

 

 

*Guide for implementers of interventions to prevent falls in community-dwelling older people. Material of strategic resources for parties involved. The report expands and serves as a companion guide to the European Network for Safety among Elderly (EUNESE) Guide, entitled: “Learn From The Eunese Pilot Projects Experience: A 7-Step Guide to implement successful interventions for injury prevention among elderly people (65+)”. It provides invaluable information on the prevention of falls among older people, while including materials on strategic resources & models for parties involved.

 

*Good and promising interventions for the prevention of injuries to pedestrians and two-wheelers-Inventory and guidebook for the health sector. The aim of this report is to build common knowledge on what is known to work in injury prevention when targeting vulnerable road users and falls in pedestrians (“inventory”), and to guide politicians, administrators and other stakeholders in the public health sector in the implementation of policies and practices (“policy guide”).

 

*Injuries to vulnerable road users including falls in pedestrians in the EU-A data report. The first main aim of this study was to give a comprehensive view on injuries to VRU including FiP in the EU and to identify data gaps through the combination of different databases of data of the health and traffic sector. Secondly, on behalf of tailor made injury prevention measures injuries to two wheelers and pedestrians should be analysed in regards to sex, age, injury mechanism and type of injury. Finally a feasible method should be developed to improve the routine reporting on injuries to VRU in the EU in the future.  

 

*Safe school ways by implementing school travel plans in primary schools in Vienna-An evaluation report aims to evaluate an intervention on the prevention of child pedestrian injuries in AT in order to show the effect of the initiative of school travel plans in primary schools in Vienna. A fundamental element in school travel safety planning is a school travel plan. This is a map for pupils of primary schools showing dangerous spots and recommended school travel routes in school surroundings.  

 

*’Stick it well on your head! Development, implementation and evaluation of a school based helmet promotion program in Athens. The report aims to present in a distinct and comprehensive way the multi-faceted process of educational program planning. It is specifically guided by results derived from qualitative research with young two-wheel motorized vehicle users in Greece and applies the key concepts of the Health Belief Model in the development and implementation of a school-based helmet promotion program, targeting eligible adolescent drivers.

*Traffic and the Risk of Vehicle Pedestrian Injury: A Stochastic Mathematical Model was developed to estimate the effect of alternative transport scenarios on the risk of vehicle pedestrian injury. The model comprises four sub- models: traffic dynamics, pedestrian dynamics, collision incidence and injury severity. The model was used to estimate the pedestrian injury rate for a baseline scenario, corresponding to current traffic conditions in London, and three alternative scenarios.  

 

*A mathematical modelling framework of motorized two-wheelers injury rate. This study aimed to propose a modelling framework for evaluating the impact of interventions on motorcyclist risk of injury. This resulted in an extension of existing models for the simulation of traffic flow by incorporating motorcycle crashes and injuries. This suite of models can be used in practice as generic decision support tools by policy makers to evaluate alternative transport policies in terms of their health impact.

 

*Inventory of European NGOs. The inventory is divided into six injury domains: Consumer Safety, Suicide prevention, Transport, Violence prevention, Work safety, other relevant organizations. Available also at:   www.eurosafe.eu.com:80/csi/eurosafe2006.nsf/wwwVwContent/l3results.htm?OpenDocument.

 

 

*Network of EU non governmental Organizations and, whenever applicable, their national member organization that plays a role in implementing injury prevention policies. Following personal contact and a series of meetings, the network comprises the APOLLO work package leaders and several NGOS as founding members, whereas key representatives of EU Organizations, such as WHO, DG TREN and DG SANCO, played a major role in its development.

*Declaration on priorities in injury prevention safety promotion in the EU. The first document singed by the APOLLO work package leaders and NGOs as founding members during the 2nd Injury Prevention and Safety Promotion Conference in Paris on October 2008 stating their consensus in collaborating towards addressing all types of injuries in all age groups according to the priorities set in the relevant documents of the official EU and WHO documents and also the terms and conditions of this collaboration.

 

*Policy briefings on the state of art in Public Health actions on injury prevention and safety policies in Europe. Available at www.eurosafe.eu.com/csi/eurosafe2006.nsf/wwwVwContent/l4wp6results.htm?OpenDocument

 

In conclusion, the tasks provisioned in the contract have been successfully completed within the approved timeframe and budget.

APOLLO Interim and Final Technical Implementation Reports

With the collaboration of renowned injury prevention experts, the APOLLO project managed to achieve its initial goal, namely to deliver a pragmatic vision for implementation of successful and cost efficient injury prevention and safety promotion activities in the EU. In addition to the main and associated beneficiaries, numerous experts on injury prevention and safety promotion deriving from 32 countries were involved in the project, completed a variety of tasks over and beyond contractual obligations and assumed wide dissemination of the APOLLO products. The contribution of the EC has been acknowledged in more than 50 presentations of the results in International and National Conferences as well as in the 15 scientific manuscripts, which until the compilation of this report have been published or accepted for publication in prestigious, peer reviewed journals.  More importantly, in the context of this project, the EC and EU experts in injury prevention have contributed two sustainable and long needed products, namely the development of a functioning hospital discharge injury database and its query system, a set of populated injury prevention indicators in order to monitor progress across EU and a tool that summarizes the current state of the art in injury prevention for the EU citizen, i.e. the European Code Against Injuries that can be readily used by 90% of the EU population.

 

 

Center for Research and Prevention of Injuries   (CE.RE.PR.I)

Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics
Medical School, University of Athens
75 Mikras Asias Street
Athens 115 27, Greece

Coordinating Organization of APOLLO Project  [2004119]

 

Eleni Petridou

E-mail: epetrid@med.uoa.gr

Sakis Ntinapogias 

E-mail: ntinap@med.uoa.gr

 

 

 

 

 

 


Home ] Partners ] WP1 ] WP2 ] WP3 ] WP4 ] WP5 ] WP6 ] Contact Information ] [ APOLLO RESULTS ]

For further information about APOLLO project, please contact us at: apollo@med.uoa.gr